Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daria Kuczer vs Ariana Geerlings Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kuczer vs Geerlings analysis and find out who is favored!
Daria Kuczer vs Ariana Geerlings Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kuczer 0 - 0 Geerlings
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kuczer has won 47.79% of points on their second serve, while Geerlings has won 44.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kuczer, in recent form, has won 59.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Geerlings has won 60.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.99% and 47.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kuczer has saved 53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Geerlings has saved 51.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kuczer has won 73.58% of matches played (W/L 39/ 14), with Geerlings winning 68.89% (W/L 31/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kuczer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 54/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5). Geerlings has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 38/ 19), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Kuczer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.42% of matches (W/L 32/ 11), where as Geerlings has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 88% of matches (W/L 22/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kuczer has played against opponents with an average rank of 96.79 while Geerlings has played against players with an average rank of 202.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kuczer has won 79% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Geerlings has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kuczer has converted 48.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Geerlings has converted 49.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
853
Rank
853
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
582
Rank
582
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
61% (92-60)
Career Total W/L
63% (42-25)
72% (21-8)
YTD W/L
70% (23-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daria Kuczer | Ariana Geerlings |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 72% (21/8) | 70% (23/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (42/22) | 67% (54/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (325/249) | 57% (442/336) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 72% (13/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 70% (23/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 12 | 16 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.42 |
| DFs Total | 65 | 159 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:28 | 1:34:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 151.28 | 219.64 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1137/1658) | 68% (1470/2174) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (674/1137) | 59% (865/1470) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (249/521) | 44% (310/704) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (110/228) | 50% (172/345) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (831/1743) | 52% (1103/2128) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (3/1) | 47% (7/8) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (18/7) | 94% (16/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (20/28) | 70% (23/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 42% (5/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (5/5) | 47% (7/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (16/16) | 82% (22/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (16/0) | 18% (22/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (13/5) | 45% (11/5) |
Daria Kuczer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Daria Kuczer
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Andreea Prisacariu
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
74%
(
58 of
78)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Lia Karatancheva
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Ksenia Laskutova
63%
(
75 of
119)
1st Serve %
74%
(
84 of
113)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
0
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
48 of
84)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
54 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
113)
117
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Kazionova
Player
Daria Kuczer
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Magdalena Stoilkovska
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Daria Kuczer
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Mila Masic
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Jenny Duerst
70%
(
97 of
138)
1st Serve %
61%
(
71 of
117)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
9
53%
(
51 of
97)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
47%
(
65 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
55 of
117)
128
Total Points Won
127
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
5-7 6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Ariana Geerlings Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Mana Kawamura
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
51%
(
25 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(1) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Anja Stankovic
77%
(
98 of
127)
1st Serve %
48%
(
53 of
110)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
55 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
121
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(2) 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
10
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
56 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(7) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
48%
(
23 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Dunja Maric
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
84%
(
53 of
63)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
53%
(
36 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Garcia Cid
Player
Ariana Geerlings
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
73 of
114)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
42 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
114)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Ariana Geerlings
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
83%
(
58 of
70)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Leonie Kung
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kuczer Vs Geerlings Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
